CodaLumo web app MVP pricing: from PLN 8,900 net
This is CodaLumo's starting price for business clients in Poland, in PLN excluding VAT. It is neither a market average nor a guaranteed price for every application. An individual quote depends on the agreed scope.
At CodaLumo, a focused web application MVP starts from PLN 8,900 net. It concentrates on one essential business process and can include up to five main screens, basic user accounts, a database and one simple integration.
This is not the price of every system. A customer portal, a larger B2B platform or a tool with multiple roles and integrations needs an individual quote. We define the outcome of the first version before choosing features and technology.
- focused MVP: from PLN 8,900 net
- typical first-version timeline: 4–6 weeks
- larger systems or several integrations: individual quote
What does the application price usually include?
A useful quote describes a working product rather than development hours alone. A core project covers process discovery, MVP scope, UX/UI design, application development, the database, testing and launch.
The scope should also specify screens, user roles, sign-in rules, data types and integrations. This makes the result clear and lets optional features move into a planned second phase.
- problem and user discovery
- MVP scope and screen flows
- responsive UX/UI design
- development and database
- testing, deployment and handover
What affects the cost most?
The greatest difference comes from the complexity of user actions, not simply the number of screens. A form that saves one record costs less than a workflow with approvals, notifications, attachments, an audit history and several permission levels.
- number of roles and access levels
- sign-in, password recovery and additional security
- payments, documents, messages and notifications
- accounting, CRM, mapping or external API integrations
- administration tools, reports and data exports
- custom visual design and language versions
Why can integrations be expensive?
An integration depends on the quality and capability of the other system. A well-documented API makes data exchange straightforward, while older software may require extra coordination, unusual authentication or an intermediate file-exchange process.
Before development begins, check the documentation, limits and access to a test environment. One simple integration may fit into the starting MVP, while several complex connections often become a separate project phase.
How to reduce the first-version cost
The best approach is not to find a cheaper substitute for every feature. It is to focus the scope on the process that creates the most value. The first version should let a user complete the essential task from beginning to end.
Rarely used options, advanced reporting and automation can follow after real users provide feedback. This avoids spending budget on features that people do not need.
- choose one primary business process
- limit the first version to essential user roles
- reuse a secure existing sign-in or payment service where suitable
- move advanced reports and automation into a later phase
- prepare sample data and process rules before development
Development is not the entire budget
After launch, the application may use hosting, a domain, messaging, maps, payments or other external services. Many are inexpensive at low usage, but they should be identified before the project is approved.
Plan for maintenance, backups, security updates and further development as well. Software that supports an important business process still needs attention after its first release.
How to get a reliable quote
For the first conversation, describe the users, their problem, the essential action and the data required to complete it. Examples of the current process—such as a spreadsheet, form, email or existing system—are especially helpful.
After a short review, we prepare the first-version scope, indicative timeline and price. When the budget is limited, we identify features that can safely move into the next phase without making the product incomplete.